Author Guidelines
Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.
Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents, and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.
An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise, and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.
Here are the things the author needs to pay attention to:
Abstract
Abstracts contain important things related to the article, including objectives, research methods, population and sample/object of research, research instruments, and research results. Abstracts must be written with 150-250 words and given a minimum of 3 keywords and a maximum of 5.
Introduction
The introductory section mainly contains the reasons for conducting the research, which is supported by a literature review (theoretical). The introductory section is expected to contain as many citations from scientific journals as possible (preferably from reputable international journals).
Method
The methods section must be able to explain the research methods used, including how they are carried out. Research tools, materials, media, or instruments must be well explained. If there are statistical formulas that are used as part of the research method, it is better not to write down formulas that are generally accepted.
Results and Discussion
Results
This section describes the research results in detail, including displaying the results of calculations, the results of needs analysis, and so on. The results of this study can also be displayed in the form of tables or figures, provided that the tables or figures are not too long, too large, or too numerous. Authors should use variations in the presentation of tables or figures, and each table or figure presented must be referenced (not rewritten) in the text. We recommend that you do not include SPSS data processing results tables in the article (authors are required to re-summarize and create a separate table according to the format requested in this journal template).
Discussion
Discussion of research results is a form of scholarly research. For this reason, the author is expected to be able to reveal in detail and in depth the things that are the findings in his research. In this section, the author must refer to the results of previous studies that have been published in scientific journals (especially reputable international journals).
Here are some examples of writing references in the body of the article. Writing can be like this (Rosadi, 2026), or there are also two authors, so it is written like this (Rosadi & Hawassy, 2015). If there are four or more authors, it is written like this (Hawassy et al., 2015). Then, the name can also be written outside the brackets, such as Rosadi (2022), according to the statement written. Reference writing DOES NOT NEED to include the page from the cited reference source. It should be noted that all naming follows the last name of each author cited.
The discussion section is expected to provide a new contribution and color for the development of science, especially in the fields according to the articles written. For this reason, the author is expected to really pay special attention to ensuring that the written discussion is an important part of the overall content of the article, which can improve the quality of science.
Conclusion
The conclusion from the results of research that has been carried out is the answer to the formulation of the problem. Conclusions are aligned with the problem formulation and research objectives. In the case of more than one conclusion, it is written using numbering and not using bullets. In this concluding section, the prospects for the development of the research results and further applications can also be added as prospects for the next study.
Reference
All references cited in the body of the article must be listed in the bibliography section and written in one space alphabetically and using the American Psychological Association (APA) writing standards.
Note: No need to separate references in the form of books, journals, and so on. The following is a list of the contents of the bibliography.
